OnePlus Turbo 6V vs Samsung Galaxy S26

The OnePlus Turbo 6V (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $230 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 74/100 vs 60/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Turbo 6V has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 4000); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (2,827,538 vs 1,041,898); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably better than the OnePlus Turbo 6V — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OnePlus Turbo 6V

Performance 60
Display 94
Camera 32
Battery 76
Portability 44
Value for money 74

Samsung Galaxy S26

Performance 89
Display 81
Camera 77
Battery 31
Portability 89
Value for money 62

What makes OnePlus Turbo 6V better?

  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $799

  • Longer battery life (76/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2827538 vs 1041898
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1223
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 3168
  • Lighter: 162g vs 215g

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (77/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (89/100 vs 44/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OnePlus Turbo 6V vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 14 points higher (74/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6V leads (76/100 vs 31/100). Value score: OnePlus Turbo 6V — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6V (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6V is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6V (77/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6V significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (76/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6V (89/100 vs 44/100).

OnePlus Turbo 6V: The OnePlus Turbo 6V is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Samsung Galaxy S26: The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification OnePlus Turbo 6V Samsung Galaxy S26
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 1041898 2827538
Geekbench Single 1223 2880
Geekbench Multi 3168 9100
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1272x2772 2340x1080
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9000 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 80W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 146
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 12 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.5×77.5×8.5 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 215 g 162 g
Launch price $230 $799

Camera comparison

OnePlus Turbo 6V

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
77
camera

Display comparison

OnePlus Turbo 6V

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2772
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

OnePlus Turbo 6V

  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
76
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus Turbo 6V and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus Turbo 6V Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
60/100
1041898 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600
74/100 +63.2%
2827538 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 leads OnePlus Turbo 6V by 63.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OnePlus Turbo 6V

$230

Samsung Galaxy S26

$799

Launch price difference: $569. OnePlus Turbo 6V was $569 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6V (89/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6V is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6V (77/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Turbo 6V significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (76/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Turbo 6V (89/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OnePlus Turbo 6V or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably better than the OnePlus Turbo 6V — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the OnePlus Turbo 6V and the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The OnePlus Turbo 6V has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Turbo 6V or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Turbo 6V or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (89/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the OnePlus Turbo 6V over the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The OnePlus Turbo 6V is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.