OnePlus Nord N300 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The OnePlus Nord N300 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 810, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 44/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 569,913).
OnePlus Nord N300
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 569913
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 684
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1900
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the OnePlus Nord N300 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 14 points higher (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (61/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Nord N300 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | OnePlus Nord N300 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 569913 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 684 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1900 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | — | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, OxygenOS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×75.1×8.0 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
OnePlus Nord N300
- Main: —
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
OnePlus Nord N300
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OnePlus Nord N300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared OnePlus Nord N300 and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 pro leads OnePlus Nord N300 by 43.6% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (61/100 vs 42/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (89/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Nord N300 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the OnePlus Nord N300 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably better than the OnePlus Nord N300 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the OnePlus Nord N300 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The OnePlus Nord N300 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Nord N300 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 42/100).
Should you choose the OnePlus Nord N300 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The OnePlus Nord N300 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.