OnePlus Nord N300 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
The OnePlus Nord N300 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 810, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 44/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 569,913).
OnePlus Nord N300
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Lighter: 190g vs 204g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 569913
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 684
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 1900
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the OnePlus Nord N300 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra scores 27 points higher (71/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (69/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (69/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Nord N300 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | OnePlus Nord N300 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 569913 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 684 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1900 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, OxygenOS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×75.1×8.0 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 204 g | |
| Price | — | — |
OnePlus Nord N300
- Main: —
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
OnePlus Nord N300
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OnePlus Nord N300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared OnePlus Nord N300 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads OnePlus Nord N300 by 55.9% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (69/100 vs 42/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 (80/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Nord N300 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the OnePlus Nord N300 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord N300 by 27 points (71/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the OnePlus Nord N300 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The OnePlus Nord N300 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Nord N300 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on performance (69/100 vs 42/100).
Should you choose the OnePlus Nord N300 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The OnePlus Nord N300 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.