OnePlus Nord CE6 vs Vivo iQOO 15T
The OnePlus Nord CE6 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 58/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (3,815,522 vs 1,145,513).
OnePlus Nord CE6
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Overall rating 58/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3815522 vs 1145513
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1237
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3281
- Faster charging: 100W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 62/100)
- Better camera (65/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)
Comparing the OnePlus Nord CE6 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 24 points higher (82/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (95/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE6 (95/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE6 (65/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE6 (75/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | OnePlus Nord CE6 | Vivo iQOO 15T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1145513 | 3815522 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1237 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3281 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66 | IP68 | |
| Weight | — | 216 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
OnePlus Nord CE6
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
OnePlus Nord CE6
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2712
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OnePlus Nord CE6
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared OnePlus Nord CE6 and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15T leads OnePlus Nord CE6 by 70.0% in our overall performance rating.
OnePlus Nord CE6
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE6 (95/100 vs 62/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE6 (65/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE6 (75/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the OnePlus Nord CE6 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the OnePlus Nord CE6 by 24 points (82/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the OnePlus Nord CE6 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The OnePlus Nord CE6 has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Nord CE6 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Nord CE6 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (95/100 vs 62/100).
Should you choose the OnePlus Nord CE6 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The OnePlus Nord CE6 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.