OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra vs OPPO Reno 16 FS
The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; launch prices were $555 and $549. By overall MobileRank rating, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads — 74/100 vs 61/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra has the bigger battery (8600 mAh vs 6500); the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,429,868 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 217g).
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Higher AnTuTu: 3429868 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 8600 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
- Lighter: 194g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $549 vs $555
- Better camera (64/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra vs the OPPO Reno 16 FS, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra scores 13 points higher (74/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (64/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads (82/100 vs 58/100). Value score: OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra — 66/100, OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (64/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (82/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (58/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra | OPPO Reno 16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 3429868 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8600 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×77.5×8.5 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $555 | $549 |
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2772
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
- 8600 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra and OPPO Reno 16 FS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 290.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $6. OPPO Reno 16 FS was $6 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (93/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (64/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (82/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (58/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is noticeably better than the OPPO Reno 16 FS — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the OPPO Reno 16 FS — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS leads on camera score (64/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra over the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.