Nubia Z60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nubia Z60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nubia Z60 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 69/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Z60 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,527,231); the Nubia Z60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (226g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Nubia Z60 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 226g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $2899
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (35/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2527231
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Z60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Nubia Z60 Ultra scores 6 points higher (75/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z60 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Nubia Z60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Nubia Z60 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100. In the "portability" category, the Nubia Z60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (35/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Z60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2527231 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x1116 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×76.4×8.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Nubia Z60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.59
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Nubia Z60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x1116
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Z60 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia Z60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nubia Z60 Ultra by 13.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2300. Nubia Z60 Ultra was $2300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Z60 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Z60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (35/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Z60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Z60 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nubia Z60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Z60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Z60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Z60 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Z60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Z60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Z60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.