Nubia Neo 5 vs Redmi K80 Ultra
The Nubia Neo 5 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T9300, while the Redmi K80 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads — 60/100 vs 31/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Ultra has the bigger battery (7410 mAh vs 6050).
Nubia Neo 5
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 7410 vs 6050 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 5 vs the Redmi K80 Ultra, the Redmi K80 Ultra scores 29 points higher (60/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Nubia Neo 5 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (50/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 5 | Redmi K80 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T9300 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2876004 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" OLED | |
| Resolution | 900x1940 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6050 mAh | 7410 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Weight | — | 219 g | |
| Price | — | $350 |
Nubia Neo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Nubia Neo 5
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 900x1940
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Neo 5
- 6050 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 7410 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Nubia Neo 5
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (61/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (72/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nubia Neo 5 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (50/100 vs 26/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 5 or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 by 29 points (60/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 5 and the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Redmi K80 Ultra — 60/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Neo 5 or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra leads on camera score (32/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 5 or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra leads on performance (61/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 5 over the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 5 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.