Nubia Neo 5 Pro vs Redmi K80 Ultra
Comparing the Nubia Neo 5 Pro (2026) and the Redmi K80 Ultra (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads — 60/100 vs 33/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Ultra has the bigger battery (7410 mAh vs 6000).
Nubia Neo 5 Pro
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 7410 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 60/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 5 Pro vs the Redmi K80 Ultra, the Redmi K80 Ultra scores 27 points higher (60/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 Pro (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 60/100). In the "design" category, the Nubia Neo 5 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (50/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 Pro (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 5 Pro | Redmi K80 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2876004 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7410 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Weight | — | 219 g | |
| Price | — | $350 |
Nubia Neo 5 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Nubia Neo 5 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Neo 5 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 7410 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Nubia Neo 5 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 Pro (61/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 60/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nubia Neo 5 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (50/100 vs 26/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 Pro (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 5 Pro or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 Pro by 27 points (60/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 5 Pro and the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 5 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Redmi K80 Ultra — 60/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Neo 5 Pro or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra leads on camera score (32/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 5 Pro or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra leads on performance (61/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 5 Pro over the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 5 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.