Nubia Neo 3 vs ZTE Blade A76
The Nubia Neo 3 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8300, while the ZTE Blade A76 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nubia Neo 3 leads — 47/100 vs 42/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Neo 3 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Neo 3
ZTE Blade A76
What makes Nubia Neo 3 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (32/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A76 better?
- Overall rating 42/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Neo 3 vs the ZTE Blade A76, the Nubia Neo 3 scores 5 points higher (47/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100. In the "display" category, the Nubia Neo 3 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 (65/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Neo 3 and the ZTE Blade A76 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Neo 3 and the ZTE Blade A76 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia Neo 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Neo 3 | ZTE Blade A76 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8300 | Unisoc T8300 | |
| AnTuTu | 639225 | 639225 | |
| Geekbench Single | 880 | 880 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2073 | 2073 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 168.3×76.5×8.3 mm | 163.6×74.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nubia Neo 3
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A76
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nubia Neo 3
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A76
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Neo 3
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia Neo 3 and ZTE Blade A76, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Neo 3 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 (65/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nubia Neo 3 and the ZTE Blade A76 are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nubia Neo 3 and the ZTE Blade A76 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Neo 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 3 or the ZTE Blade A76?
The Nubia Neo 3 edges out the ZTE Blade A76 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 3 and the ZTE Blade A76?
The Nubia Neo 3 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the ZTE Blade A76 — 42/100.
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 3 over the ZTE Blade A76?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Nubia Neo 3 (65/100 vs 43/100).