Nubia Neo 3 vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
The Nubia Neo 3 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8300, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads — 67/100 vs 49/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,754,213 vs 639,225).
Nubia Neo 3
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Overall rating 49/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1754213 vs 639225
- Better Geekbench Single: 2004 vs 880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5311 vs 2073
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Higher performance (75/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 3 vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra scores 18 points higher (67/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads (75/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 (75/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 3 | ZTE Axon 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 639225 | 1754213 | |
| Geekbench Single | 880 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2073 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nubia Neo 3
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Neo 3
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Neo 3
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Neo 3 and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads Nubia Neo 3 by 63.6% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 (75/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 3 (57/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 3 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nubia Neo 3 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 3 and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 3 has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 67/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Neo 3 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 3 or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra leads on performance (75/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 3 over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 3 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.