Nubia Neo 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nubia Neo 2 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T820, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 48/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Neo 2 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 757,199); the Nubia Neo 2 is noticeably lighter (208g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Neo 2
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Nubia Neo 2 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 208g vs 309g
- Better portability (49/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 757199
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 885
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2392
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 50/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Neo 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 21 points higher (69/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 2 (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Nubia Neo 2 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 2 (52/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia Neo 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Neo 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T820 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 757199 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 885 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2392 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×76.1×8.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Nubia Neo 2
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Nubia Neo 2
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Neo 2
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia Neo 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nubia Neo 2 by 74.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nubia Neo 2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 2 (90/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Nubia Neo 2 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 2 (52/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Neo 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 2 by 21 points (69/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 2 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Neo 2 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Neo 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 2 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.