Nubia NaviX Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro

The Nubia NaviX Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400; launch prices were $845 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nubia NaviX Ultra leads — 92/100 vs 82/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia NaviX Ultra has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Nubia NaviX Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,825,187); the Nubia NaviX Ultra is noticeably lighter (208g vs 223g).

The Nubia NaviX Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nubia NaviX Ultra

Performance 98
Display 94
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 59
Value for money 98

Vivo X200 Pro

Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 84
Battery 76
Portability 43
Value for money 78

What makes Nubia NaviX Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2825187
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2866
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9980
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
  • Lighter: 208g vs 223g

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 84/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X200 Pro better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $845

  • Overall rating 82/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nubia NaviX Ultra vs the Vivo X200 Pro, the Nubia NaviX Ultra scores 10 points higher (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra leads (96/100 vs 84/100). Value score: Nubia NaviX Ultra — 98/100, Vivo X200 Pro — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).

Nubia NaviX Ultra: The Nubia NaviX Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X200 Pro: The Vivo X200 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nubia NaviX Ultra Vivo X200 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu 3950082 2825187
Geekbench Single 3639 2866
Geekbench Multi 11047 9980
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 2800x1260
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7100 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 90W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 30W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / Funtouch OS 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 162.1×75.7×7.6 mm 162.4×76.0×8.2 mm
Weight 208 g 223 g
Launch price $845 $799

Camera comparison

Nubia NaviX Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Vivo X200 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
84
camera

Display comparison

Nubia NaviX Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Vivo X200 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Nubia NaviX Ultra

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
85
battery

Vivo X200 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:47 hrs, total 24:55 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 30W
76
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nubia NaviX Ultra and Vivo X200 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nubia NaviX Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
92/100
3950082 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9400
82/100 -39.8%
2825187 AnTuTu

Nubia NaviX Ultra leads Vivo X200 Pro by 39.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nubia NaviX Ultra

$845

Vivo X200 Pro

$799

Launch price difference: $46. Vivo X200 Pro was $46 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 84/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nubia NaviX Ultra or the Vivo X200 Pro?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Nubia NaviX Ultra and the Vivo X200 Pro?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 92/100, the Vivo X200 Pro — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nubia NaviX Ultra or the Vivo X200 Pro?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 84/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nubia NaviX Ultra or the Vivo X200 Pro?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 90/100).

Should you choose the Nubia NaviX Ultra over the Vivo X200 Pro?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.