Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11

The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $449 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 64/100 vs 49/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 1,405,881); the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 210g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Performance 12
Display 100
Camera 74
Battery 48
Design 56
Value for money 79
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Performance 70
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 77
Design 37
Value for money 82
What makes Nothing Phone (4a) Pro better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 210g

  • Better camera (74/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 1405881
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1237
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 3281
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper: $400 vs $449

  • Higher performance (70/100 vs 12/100)
  • Longer battery life (77/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better value for money (82/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 15 points higher (64/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (70/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro leads (74/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (77/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (70/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (74/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (77/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100).

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro: The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1405881 3154662
Geekbench Single 1237 3050
Geekbench Multi 3281 9300
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP65
Dimensions 163.7×76.6×8.0 mm
Weight 195 g 210 g
Price $449 $400
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
77
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
49/100
1405881 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
64/100 +55.4%
3154662 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Nothing Phone (4a) Pro by 55.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
$449
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
$400

Price difference: $49. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is cheaper by $49.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (70/100 vs 12/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (74/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (77/100 vs 48/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (56/100 vs 37/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (70/100 vs 12/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.