Nothing CMF Phone 1 vs Vivo V40e
The Nothing CMF Phone 1 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo V40e (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo V40e leads — 57/100 vs 51/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo V40e has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5000); the Nothing CMF Phone 1 is faster in AnTuTu (878,041 vs 877,641).
Nothing CMF Phone 1
Vivo V40e
- Higher AnTuTu: 878041 vs 877641
- Overall rating 51/100
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Lighter: 183g vs 197g
- Better camera (44/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (62/100 vs 46/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Nothing CMF Phone 1 vs the Vivo V40e, the Vivo V40e scores 6 points higher (57/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40e leads (44/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e leads (62/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40e is a bit better (44/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e notably outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 1 (62/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40e notably outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 1 (74/100 vs 58/100).
| Specification | Nothing CMF Phone 1 | Vivo V40e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 878041 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 2.6 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×77.0×8.2 mm | 163.7×75.0×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nothing CMF Phone 1
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo V40e
- Main: 50MP f/f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing CMF Phone 1
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40e
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing CMF Phone 1
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo V40e
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nothing CMF Phone 1 and Vivo V40e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40e is a bit better (44/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e notably outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 1 (62/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40e notably outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 1 (74/100 vs 58/100).
Which is better: the Nothing CMF Phone 1 or the Vivo V40e?
The Vivo V40e edges out the Nothing CMF Phone 1 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nothing CMF Phone 1 and the Vivo V40e?
The Nothing CMF Phone 1 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo V40e — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing CMF Phone 1 or the Vivo V40e?
The Vivo V40e leads on camera score (44/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Nothing CMF Phone 1 over the Vivo V40e?
The Nothing CMF Phone 1 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo V40e is a better fit for everyday use.