Nokia XR30 vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads — 50/100 vs 46/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia XR30 has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo iQOO Z7 is faster in AnTuTu (750,481 vs 592,015); the Nokia XR30 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR30
Vivo iQOO Z7
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4500 mAh
- Better camera (43/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 750481 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 936 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2318 vs 2101
- Faster charging: 44W vs 33W
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (38/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (69/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Vivo iQOO Z7 scores 4 points higher (50/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (38/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 750481 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 936 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 2318 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 173 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia XR30 and Vivo iQOO Z7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z7 leads Nokia XR30 by 21.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (38/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 edges out the Nokia XR30 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 50/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 leads on performance (51/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Vivo iQOO Z7 (51/100 vs 46/100).