Nokia X30 vs Oppo Reno9 Pro
The Nokia X30 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Oppo Reno9 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno9 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 23/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno9 Pro has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 4200).
Nokia X30
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Overall rating 23/100
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 185g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (35/100 vs 20/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (82/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Nokia X30 vs the Oppo Reno9 Pro, the Oppo Reno9 Pro scores 10 points higher (33/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro leads (35/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro and the Nokia X30 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (35/100 vs 20/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia X30 | Oppo Reno9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | — | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2412 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 67W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | 950 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | 161.5×73.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 174 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro and the Nokia X30 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (35/100 vs 20/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia X30 or the Oppo Reno9 Pro?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro is noticeably better than the Nokia X30 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia X30 and the Oppo Reno9 Pro?
The Nokia X30 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Oppo Reno9 Pro — 33/100.
Should you choose the Nokia X30 over the Oppo Reno9 Pro?
The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno9 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.