Nokia G400 vs Samsung Galaxy M07
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy M07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 41/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M07 is faster in AnTuTu (552,286 vs 477,542); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M07 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M07 is thinner (7.6mm vs 8.8mm).
Nokia G400
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 727
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 552286 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2047 vs 1816
- Faster charging: 25W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 184g vs 198g
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Samsung Galaxy M07, the Nokia G400 scores 2 points higher (43/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy M07 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (73/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Samsung Galaxy M07 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 552286 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 2047 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 184 g | |
| Price | — | $113 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Samsung Galaxy M07, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M07 leads Nokia G400 by 13.5% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (66/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy M07 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (73/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Nokia G400 edges out the Samsung Galaxy M07 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Samsung Galaxy M07 — 41/100.
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M07 is a better fit for everyday use.