Nokia G400 vs Poco X7 Pro
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Poco X7 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco X7 Pro leads — 64/100 vs 43/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco X7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,884,839 vs 477,542).
Nokia G400
Poco X7 Pro
- Overall rating 43/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1884839 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 1816
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 195g vs 198g
- Higher performance (75/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Poco X7 Pro, the Poco X7 Pro scores 21 points higher (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro leads (75/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro leads (65/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 (75/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (65/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (59/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Poco X7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 1884839 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 / HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 160.8×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | $369 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco X7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco X7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Poco X7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Poco X7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco X7 Pro leads Nokia G400 by 74.7% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 (75/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (83/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco X7 Pro and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X7 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (65/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco X7 Pro is a bit better (59/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 by 21 points (64/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Poco X7 Pro?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Poco X7 Pro — 64/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Poco X7 Pro?
The Poco X7 Pro leads on performance (75/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Poco X7 Pro?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco X7 Pro is a better fit for active users.