Nokia C5 Endi vs Vivo Y32t
The Nokia C5 Endi (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 18/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 177,554); the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 200g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C5 Endi
Vivo Y32t
What makes Nokia C5 Endi better?
- Better camera (12/100 vs 10/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 779 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 200g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 22/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C5 Endi vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 10 points higher (28/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia C5 Endi and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C5 Endi (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C5 Endi (68/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C5 Endi | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.7×76.7×8.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia C5 Endi
- Main: 13MP
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia C5 Endi
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nokia C5 Endi
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia C5 Endi and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Nokia C5 Endi by 41.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia C5 Endi and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C5 Endi (52/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Nokia C5 Endi (68/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C5 Endi or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t is noticeably better than the Nokia C5 Endi — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C5 Endi and the Vivo Y32t?
The Nokia C5 Endi has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C5 Endi or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C5 Endi over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 22/100).