Nokia C32 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 37/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't.
Nokia C32
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Better portability (53/100 vs 52/100)
- Faster charging: 65W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (44/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 21 points higher (58/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Nokia C32 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (89/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 21 points (58/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.