Nokia C300 vs Vivo Y31d

The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Vivo Y31d (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y31d leads — 33/100 vs 7/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y31d has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo Y31d is faster in AnTuTu (522,680 vs 320,666); the Nokia C300 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 219g).

The Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 26 points (33/100 vs 7/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C300
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 12
Design 62
Value for money 55
Vivo Y31d
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 57
Design 26
Value for money 97
What makes Nokia C300 better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 219g

  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 26/100)
What makes Vivo Y31d better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 522680 vs 320666
  • Better Geekbench Single: 489 vs 345
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1532 vs 1065
  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 44W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP

  • Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (57/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the Vivo Y31d, the Vivo Y31d scores 26 points higher (33/100 vs 7/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (57/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y31d notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (57/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C300 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (62/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (97/100 vs 55/100).

Nokia C300: The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo Y31d: The Vivo Y31d is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C300 Vivo Y31d
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
AnTuTu 320666 522680
Geekbench Single 345 489
Geekbench Multi 1065 1532
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1600 720x1570
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7200 mAh
Charging 10W 44W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 3GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 32GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 400 nits 1250 nits
NFC no no
Protection IP68/IP69
Dimensions 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm
Weight 190 g 219 g
Price $185
Camera comparison
Nokia C300
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
0
camera
Vivo Y31d
  • Main: 50MP f/f/2.0
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C300
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Vivo Y31d
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1570
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C300
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Vivo Y31d
  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C300 and Vivo Y31d, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7/100
320666 AnTuTu
Vivo Y31d Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
33/100 +38.6%
522680 AnTuTu

Vivo Y31d leads Nokia C300 by 38.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia C300
Price unknown
Vivo Y31d
$185
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y31d notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (24/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (57/100 vs 12/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nokia C300 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (62/100 vs 26/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (97/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo Y31d?

The Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 26 points (33/100 vs 7/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the Vivo Y31d?

The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 7/100, the Vivo Y31d — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo Y31d?

The Vivo Y31d leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the Vivo Y31d?

The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y31d is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.