Nokia C300 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 24/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 320,666); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C300 doesn't; the Nokia C300 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 63 points (87/100 vs 24/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C300
Performance 24
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 22
Portability 59
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Nokia C300 better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 226g

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 320666
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 345
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1065
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 63 points higher (87/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (93/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (81/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C300 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).

Nokia C300: The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C300 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 320666 3269794
Geekbench Single 345 3228
Geekbench Multi 1065 9553
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 10W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 400 nits 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 190 g 226 g
Launch price $899
Camera comparison
Nokia C300
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C300
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C300
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C300 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
24/100
320666 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +90.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Nokia C300 by 90.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C300
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (93/100 vs 24/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (84/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (81/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia C300 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 63 points (87/100 vs 24/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C300 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.