Nokia C300 vs Oppo Reno9 Pro
The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the Oppo Reno9 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno9 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 7/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno9 Pro has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Oppo Reno9 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C300 doesn't; the Oppo Reno9 Pro is noticeably lighter (174g vs 190g).
Nokia C300
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Overall rating 7/100
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 174g vs 190g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (35/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (82/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the Oppo Reno9 Pro, the Oppo Reno9 Pro scores 26 points higher (33/100 vs 7/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro leads (35/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (35/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (82/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C300 | Oppo Reno9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2412 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 67W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 950 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm | 161.5×73.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 174 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C300
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C300
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C300
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno9 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (37/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (35/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno9 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia C300 (82/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the Oppo Reno9 Pro?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 26 points (33/100 vs 7/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the Oppo Reno9 Pro?
The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 7/100, the Oppo Reno9 Pro — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C300 or the Oppo Reno9 Pro?
The Oppo Reno9 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the Oppo Reno9 Pro?
The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno9 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.