Nokia C300 vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Nokia C300 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 24/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 320,666); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C300 doesn't.
Nokia C300
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Better portability (59/100 vs 54/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 320666
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 345
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 1065
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C300 vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 62 points higher (86/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (89/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (83/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C300 is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Nokia C300 | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 320666 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 345 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1065 | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.7×76.6×8.6 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | — | |
| Price | — | $661 |
Nokia C300
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia C300
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C300
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Nokia C300 and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Nokia C300 by 89.6% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia C300
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (89/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (94/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 (83/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C300 is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C300 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C300 by 62 points (86/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C300 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Nokia C300 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C300 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C300 or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C300 over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Nokia C300 is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.