Nokia C22 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Nokia C22 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 30/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C22 doesn't.
Nokia C22
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Lighter: 190g vs 204g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C22 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 41 points higher (71/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C22 is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Nokia C22 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 204 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C22
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C22
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C22
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (80/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 (86/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C22 is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C22 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia C22 by 41 points (71/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C22 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Nokia C22 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C22 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C22 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Nokia C22 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.