Nokia C200 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Nokia C200 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 21/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C200 doesn't; the Nokia C200 is noticeably lighter (172g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 by 66 points (87/100 vs 21/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C200
Performance 10
Display 40
Camera 10
Battery 32
Portability 68
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Nokia C200 better?
  • Lighter: 172g vs 226g

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 155362
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 300
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 486
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C200 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 66 points higher (87/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (84/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).

Nokia C200: The Nokia C200 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C200 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Helio A22 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 155362 3269794
Geekbench Single 300 3228
Geekbench Multi 486 9553
Display 6.1" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1560 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 156.5×73.1×8.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 172 g 226 g
Price $899
Camera comparison
Nokia C200
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C200
  • 6.1" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1560
  • Refresh rate: —
40
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C200
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
32
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C200 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C200 MediaTek Helio A22
21/100
155362 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +95.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Nokia C200 by 95.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia C200
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (93/100 vs 10/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (84/100 vs 40/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 (81/100 vs 32/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia C200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (68/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C200 by 66 points (87/100 vs 21/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C200 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nokia C200 has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 10/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C200 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Nokia C200 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.