Nokia C110 vs Vivo Y32t

The Nokia C110 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 6/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000).

The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C110 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C110
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 0
Design 85
Value for money 55
Vivo Y32t
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 36
Design 76
Value for money 55
What makes Nokia C110 better?
  • Lighter: 172g vs 179g

  • Better design/ergonomics (85/100 vs 76/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh

  • Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C110 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 5 points higher (11/100 vs 6/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C110 is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Nokia C110: The Nokia C110 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo Y32t: The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C110 Vivo Y32t
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 MediaTek Helio P70 ()
AnTuTu 156818
Geekbench Single 233
Geekbench Multi 723
Display 6.3" IPS LCD 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution 720x1560 720x1600
Refresh rate
Battery 3000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 5W
Main camera 13 MP 13 MP
Front camera 5 MP 8 MP
RAM 3GB
Storage 32GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 12 Android 11 Red Velvet Cake
Brightness (peak) 400 nits
NFC no no
Dimensions 160.8×74.0×8.5 mm 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm
Weight 172 g 179 g
Price
Camera comparison
Nokia C110
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Vivo Y32t
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
0
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C110
  • 6.3" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1560
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Vivo Y32t
  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C110
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Vivo Y32t
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Nokia C110 (36/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nokia C110 is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C110 or the Vivo Y32t?

The Vivo Y32t edges out the Nokia C110 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nokia C110 and the Vivo Y32t?

The Nokia C110 has a MobileRank rating of 6/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.

Should you choose the Nokia C110 over the Vivo Y32t?

The Nokia C110 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.