Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) vs Vivo Y32t
The Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) leads — 34/100 vs 11/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (34/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 188g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 65/100)
Comparing the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) scores 23 points higher (34/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) leads (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×75.9×7.8 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (34/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 65/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 23 points (34/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) and the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) leads on camera score (34/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) over the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.