Nokia C100 vs Redmi Turbo 5
The Nokia C100 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 67/100 vs 18/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 155,362); the Redmi Turbo 5 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C100 doesn't.
Nokia C100
Redmi Turbo 5
- Overall rating 18/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (80/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Nokia C100 vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 49 points higher (67/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (80/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (80/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (85/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (74/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Nokia C100 | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 6403 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | $250 |
Nokia C100
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Nokia C100
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C100
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia C100 and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Nokia C100 by 94.5% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia C100
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (80/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (85/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Nokia C100 (37/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 (74/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C100 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Nokia C100 by 49 points (67/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C100 and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Nokia C100 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 67/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C100 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C100 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (80/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C100 over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Nokia C100 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.