Nokia 300 Charge vs Vivo X Fold6
A full comparison of the Nokia 300 Charge and the Vivo X Fold6 is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the Nokia 300 Charge to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 300 Charge
Performance
—
Display
30
Camera
—
Battery
15
Portability
68
Value for money
—
Vivo X Fold6
Performance
95
Display
81
Camera
87
Battery
82
Portability
100
Value for money
84
What makes Nokia 300 Charge better?
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3700 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 300 Charge | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 2.4" | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3700 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 20 MP | |
| RAM | — | 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 512GB | |
| OS | — | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 136.6×55.0×15.0 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 138 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Nokia 300 Charge
- Main: —
- Front: —
—
cameraVivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
87
cameraDisplay comparison
Nokia 300 Charge
- 2.4"
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
30
displayVivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
displayBattery and charging
Nokia 300 Charge
- 3700 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
15
batteryVivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
82
battery