Nokia 300 Charge vs Vivo iQOO 13
A full comparison of the Nokia 300 Charge and the Vivo iQOO 13 is not possible yet: there is too little verified data on the Nokia 300 Charge to compute a MobileRank score. The specs we do have are in the table below.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 300 Charge
Performance
—
Display
30
Camera
—
Battery
15
Portability
68
Value for money
—
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance
91
Display
99
Camera
78
Battery
73
Portability
55
Value for money
82
What makes Nokia 300 Charge better?
- Lighter: 138g vs 207g
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3700 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 10W
Comparison verdict
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia 300 Charge | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9287 | |
| Display | 2.4" | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3700 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 120W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 136.6×55.0×15.0 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 138 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Nokia 300 Charge
- Main: —
- Front: —
—
cameraVivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
78
cameraDisplay comparison
Nokia 300 Charge
- 2.4"
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
30
displayVivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
displayBattery and charging
Nokia 300 Charge
- 3700 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
15
batteryVivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
73
battery