Nokia 3.1 Plus vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia 3.1 Plus (2018) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 17/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 156,818); the Nokia 3.1 Plus is noticeably lighter (180g vs 226g).
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 180g vs 226g
- Better portability (69/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 156818
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 8/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia 3.1 Plus vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 70 points higher (87/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (93/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia 3.1 Plus | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 156818 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.0" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB / 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo), planned upgrade to Android 9.0 (Pie); Android One | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 156.9×76.4×8.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 3.1 Plus
- 3500 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nokia 3.1 Plus and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Nokia 3.1 Plus by 95.2% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (93/100 vs 8/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 3.1 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 3.1 Plus or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus by 70 points (87/100 vs 17/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 3.1 Plus and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia 3.1 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 3.1 Plus or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 3.1 Plus or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 8/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 3.1 Plus over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.