Nokia 3.1 Plus vs Vivo X Fold6

The Nokia 3.1 Plus (2018) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 17/100 (a 71-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 156,818); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.2mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus by 71 points (88/100 vs 17/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Performance 8
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 69
Value for money
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Nokia 3.1 Plus better?

  • Overall rating 17/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 156818
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 723
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 8/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 3.1 Plus vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 71 points higher (88/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (94/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (82/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (100/100 vs 69/100).

Nokia 3.1 Plus: The Nokia 3.1 Plus is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 3.1 Plus Vivo X Fold6
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 156818 3485039
Geekbench Single 233 3228
Geekbench Multi 723 9553
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1440 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 3500 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 80W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 20 MP
RAM 2GB 16GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 512GB
OS Android 8.1 (Oreo), planned upgrade to Android 9.0 (Pie); Android One Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 156.9×76.4×8.2 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 180 g
Launch price $1900
Camera comparison
Nokia 3.1 Plus
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.0
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 3.1 Plus
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1440
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 3.1 Plus
  • 3500 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 3.1 Plus and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 3.1 Plus MediaTek Helio P22
17/100
156818 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +95.5%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Nokia 3.1 Plus by 95.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Price unknown
Vivo X Fold6
$1900
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (94/100 vs 8/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (81/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (87/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (82/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus (100/100 vs 69/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 3.1 Plus or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia 3.1 Plus by 71 points (88/100 vs 17/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia 3.1 Plus and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Nokia 3.1 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 3.1 Plus or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia 3.1 Plus or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 8/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 3.1 Plus over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Nokia 3.1 Plus is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.