Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100; launch prices were $1499 and $150. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 46/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 575,630).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 575630
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2014
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Tecno Spark 40 Pro better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $150 vs $1499
- Better portability (76/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Tecno Spark 40 Pro, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 32 points higher (78/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Tecno Spark 40 Pro — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (92/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (60/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (64/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Tecno Spark 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G100 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 575630 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2014 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, HIOS 15.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.7×75.9×6.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $150 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.6
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Tecno Spark 40 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Tecno Spark 40 Pro by 487.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1349. Tecno Spark 40 Pro was $1349 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (92/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (95/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (60/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (64/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro by 32 points (78/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.