Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Redmi Note 17 Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi Note 17 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4; launch prices were $1499 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 57/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 809,091); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 809091
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1009
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2892
- Faster charging: 68W vs 67W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 38/100)
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $1499
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Redmi Note 17 Pro, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 21 points higher (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 Pro leads (86/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Redmi Note 17 Pro — 70/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (68/100 vs 38/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Redmi Note 17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 809091 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1009 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2892 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.5×78.3×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $230 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Redmi Note 17 Pro
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Redmi Note 17 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Redmi Note 17 Pro by 317.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1269. Redmi Note 17 Pro was $1269 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (93/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (60/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (86/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro (68/100 vs 38/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi Note 17 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro by 21 points (78/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Redmi Note 17 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Redmi Note 17 Pro — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi Note 17 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Redmi Note 17 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Redmi Note 17 Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Redmi Note 17 Pro is a better fit for those who care about battery life.