Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Nokia 4.2
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nokia 4.2 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 439; launch prices were $1499 and $169. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 18/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 193,115); the Nokia 4.2 is noticeably lighter (161g vs 199g).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Nokia 4.2
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 193115
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 795
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 12/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 34/100)
- Lighter: 161g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $169 vs $1499
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Nokia 4.2, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 60 points higher (78/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Nokia 4.2 — 6/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (93/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (95/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (64/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Nokia 4.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 193115 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 199 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 795 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 5.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1520x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 149.0×71.3×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 161 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $169 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia 4.2
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nokia 4.2
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1520x720
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nokia 4.2
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Nokia 4.2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Nokia 4.2 by 1650.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1330. Nokia 4.2 was $1330 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (93/100 vs 12/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (95/100 vs 34/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (60/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (64/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 4.2?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 by 60 points (78/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nokia 4.2?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Nokia 4.2 — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 4.2?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nokia 4.2?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 12/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Nokia 4.2?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nokia 4.2 is a better fit for everyday use.