Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Vivo X300 E
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 E (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; estimated prices are $1299 and $651. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 E leads — 81/100 vs 77/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 E has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,068,952).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Vivo X300 E
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3068952
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2903
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 61/100)
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9602 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Cheaper: $651 vs $1299
- Better camera (64/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs the Vivo X300 E, the Vivo X300 E scores 4 points higher (81/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 E leads (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 E and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 E notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 | Vivo X300 E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3068952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2903 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9602 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 157.5×74.3×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $1299 | $651 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 E
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 E
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 E
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and Vivo X300 E, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 leads Vivo X300 E by 1.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $648. Vivo X300 E is cheaper by $648.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Vivo X300 E are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 E and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 E notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (83/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Vivo X300 E?
The Vivo X300 E edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Vivo X300 E?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 E — 81/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 over the Vivo X300 E?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 E is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.