Motorola Razr Fold vs Tecno Spark 40c
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Tecno Spark 40c (2025) runs on the Helio G81; launch prices were $1799 and $102. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 33/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 40c has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 358,608); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Spark 40c doesn't; the Motorola Razr Fold is thinner (4.7mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Tecno Spark 40c
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Tecno Spark 40c better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $102 vs $1799
- Overall rating 33/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Tecno Spark 40c, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 50 points higher (83/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Tecno Spark 40c — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (90/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Tecno Spark 40c are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Tecno Spark 40c | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Helio G81 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 1416 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 165.6×77.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | — | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $102 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Spark 40c
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 40c
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Spark 40c
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Tecno Spark 40c, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Tecno Spark 40c by 752.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1697. Tecno Spark 40c was $1697 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (90/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (81/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (91/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (68/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Tecno Spark 40c are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c by 50 points (83/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Tecno Spark 40c — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.