Motorola Razr Fold vs TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $1799 and $449. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 57/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 953,150); the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER is noticeably lighter (227g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by 26 points (83/100 vs 57/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

Performance 57
Display 63
Camera 61
Battery 50
Portability 47
Value for money 38

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 953150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3185
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 33W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 47/100)

What makes TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER better?

  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 227g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $1799

  • Overall rating 57/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 26 points higher (83/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER — 38/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (68/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Fold TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 7400
AnTuTu 3057215 953150
Geekbench Single 2833 1061
Geekbench Multi 9119 3185
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER
Resolution 2480x2200 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 68W 33W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 850 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP68
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm
Weight 285 g 227 g
Launch price $1799 $449

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

  • 7.2" IPS LCD NXTPAPER
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
63
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100
3057215 AnTuTu
TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER MediaTek Dimensity 7400
57/100 -220.7%
953150 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by 220.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER

$449

Launch price difference: $1350. TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER was $1350 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (90/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (81/100 vs 63/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (91/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER (68/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER by 26 points (83/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the TCL 60 Ultra NXTPAPER?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.