Motorola Razr Fold vs Redmi K80 Ultra

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Redmi K80 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; estimated prices are $1799 and $350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 60/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Ultra has the bigger battery (7410 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,876,004); the Redmi K80 Ultra is noticeably lighter (219g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Redmi K80 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
Redmi K80 Ultra
Performance 61
Display 100
Camera 32
Battery 72
Design 26
Value for money 86
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2876004
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2729
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 8430

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Redmi K80 Ultra better?
  • Bigger battery: 7410 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 219g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $350 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (26/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Redmi K80 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 17 points higher (77/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (92/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (91/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (86/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Redmi K80 Ultra: The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold Redmi K80 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
AnTuTu 3942923 2876004
Geekbench Single 3640 2729
Geekbench Multi 11033 8430
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" OLED
Resolution 2480x2200 1280x2772
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7410 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP68
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 285 g 219 g
Price $1799 $350
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Redmi K80 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
32
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Redmi K80 Ultra
  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2772
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Redmi K80 Ultra
  • 7410 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
72
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Redmi K80 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Redmi K80 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
60/100 -37.1%
2876004 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Redmi K80 Ultra by 37.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
Redmi K80 Ultra
$350

Price difference: $1449. Redmi K80 Ultra is cheaper by $1449.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (92/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (91/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (72/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (26/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (86/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Redmi K80 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Redmi K80 Ultra — 60/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.