Motorola Razr Fold vs Realme Neo7 Turbo

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Realme Neo7 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e; launch prices were $1799 and $270. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 70/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Neo7 Turbo has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,560,650); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is noticeably lighter (205g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Realme Neo7 Turbo — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

Realme Neo7 Turbo

Performance 84
Display 84
Camera 35
Battery 85
Portability 50
Value for money 86

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2560650
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 7478

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Realme Neo7 Turbo better?

  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $270 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Realme Neo7 Turbo, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 13 points higher (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (85/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Realme Neo7 Turbo — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Realme Neo7 Turbo: The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Fold Realme Neo7 Turbo
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
AnTuTu 3057215 2560650
Geekbench Single 2833 2233
Geekbench Multi 9119 7478
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 1280x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7200 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 50W —
DXOMark (camera) 164 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 6500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 162.4×76.1×8.6 mm
Weight 285 g 205 g
Launch price $1799 $270

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Realme Neo7 Turbo

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Realme Neo7 Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Realme Neo7 Turbo

  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless charging: no data
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Realme Neo7 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100
3057215 AnTuTu
Realme Neo7 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
70/100 -19.4%
2560650 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Realme Neo7 Turbo by 19.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Realme Neo7 Turbo

$270

Launch price difference: $1529. Realme Neo7 Turbo was $1529 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (91/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (85/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Realme Neo7 Turbo — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Realme Neo7 Turbo — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 84/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.