Motorola Razr Fold vs OPPO Reno 15 Pro

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8450; estimated prices are $1799 and $420. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 51/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 15 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,050,891); the OPPO Reno 15 Pro is noticeably lighter (191g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro by 26 points (77/100 vs 51/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
OPPO Reno 15 Pro
Performance 26
Display 100
Camera 52
Battery 63
Design 61
Value for money 81
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2050891
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4313

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 26/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 52/100)
What makes OPPO Reno 15 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 191g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $420 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (81/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the OPPO Reno 15 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 26 points higher (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro leads (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (92/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (81/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
OPPO Reno 15 Pro: The OPPO Reno 15 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold OPPO Reno 15 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8450
AnTuTu 3942923 2050891
Geekbench Single 3640 1398
Geekbench Multi 11033 4313
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 2780x1264
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 68W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits
NFC yes
Protection IPX9
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 285 g 191 g
Price $1799 $420
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
OPPO Reno 15 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
OPPO Reno 15 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
OPPO Reno 15 Pro
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
63
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and OPPO Reno 15 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100
3942923 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno 15 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8450
51/100 -92.3%
2050891 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads OPPO Reno 15 Pro by 92.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
OPPO Reno 15 Pro
$420

Price difference: $1379. OPPO Reno 15 Pro is cheaper by $1379.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (92/100 vs 26/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (91/100 vs 52/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (61/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (81/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro by 26 points (77/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro — 51/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 52/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 26/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The OPPO Reno 15 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.