Motorola Razr Fold vs Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $1799 and $649. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 61/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,825,719); the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro is noticeably lighter (228g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro by 22 points (83/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro

Performance 76
Display 80
Camera 35
Battery 60
Portability 33
Value for money 36

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1825719
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 5311
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 65W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 33/100)

What makes Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 228g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $1799

  • Overall rating 61/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 22 points higher (83/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro — 36/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro (52/100 vs 33/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro: The Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Fold Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3057215 1825719
Geekbench Single 2833 2004
Geekbench Multi 9119 5311
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 2480x1116
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 68W 65W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 —
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 164.0×76.4×8.9 mm
Weight 285 g 228 g
Launch price $1799 $649

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x1116
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100
3057215 AnTuTu
Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
61/100 -67.5%
1825719 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro by 67.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro

$649

Launch price difference: $1150. Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro was $1150 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro (91/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro (52/100 vs 33/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro by 22 points (83/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro — 61/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro is a better fit for active users.