Motorola Razr Fold vs Nokia C210
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nokia C210 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 6/100 (a 71-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 320,666); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C210 doesn't; the Nokia C210 is noticeably lighter (167g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Nokia C210
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 320666
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 345
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1065
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 167g vs 285g
- Better design/ergonomics (91/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nokia C210, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 71 points higher (77/100 vs 6/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia C210 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C210 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia C210 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nokia C210 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 320666 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 345 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 1065 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 159.5×73.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 167 g | |
| Price | $1799 | — |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C210
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C210
- 6.3"
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nokia C210
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nokia C210, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nokia C210 by 1129.6% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia C210
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (91/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C210 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (91/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia C210 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia C210?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nokia C210 by 71 points (77/100 vs 6/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nokia C210?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nokia C210 — 6/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia C210?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nokia C210?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nokia C210?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nokia C210 is a better fit for everyday use.