Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo X100s Pro

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X100s Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; launch prices were $1099 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X100s Pro leads — 79/100 vs 77/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X100s Pro has the bigger battery (5400 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 2,432,004); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 224g).

The Vivo X100s Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 61
Portability 68
Value for money 64

Vivo X100s Pro

Performance 84
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 70

What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 2432004
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2249
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 7352
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 224g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 36/100)

What makes Vivo X100s Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 5400 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1099

  • Better camera (78/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo X100s Pro, the Vivo X100s Pro scores 2 points higher (79/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X100s Pro leads (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X100s Pro leads (80/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo X100s Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X100s Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X100s Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (80/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X100s Pro (68/100 vs 36/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X100s Pro: The Vivo X100s Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Vivo X100s Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
AnTuTu 3126402 2432004
Geekbench Single 3013 2249
Geekbench Multi 9287 7352
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1260x2800
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5400 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 14, OriginOS 4
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 164.1×75.3×8.9 mm
Weight 199 g 224 g
Launch price $1099 $899

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Vivo X100s Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Vivo X100s Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery

Vivo X100s Pro

  • 5400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo X100s Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
77/100
3126402 AnTuTu
Vivo X100s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
79/100 -28.6%
2432004 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Vivo X100s Pro by 28.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra

$1099

Vivo X100s Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $200. Vivo X100s Pro was $200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X100s Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (78/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X100s Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (80/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X100s Pro (68/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X100s Pro?

The Vivo X100s Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo X100s Pro?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X100s Pro — 79/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X100s Pro?

The Vivo X100s Pro leads on camera score (78/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X100s Pro?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 84/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo X100s Pro?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X100s Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.