Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Nubia Fold
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nubia Fold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 73/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Fold has the bigger battery (6560 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 249g).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Nubia Fold
- Faster charging: 68W vs 55W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 249g
- Better camera (60/100 vs 54/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 6560 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 73/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Nubia Fold, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 4 points higher (77/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nubia Fold are nearly equal (61/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Nubia Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 8.0" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6560 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 55W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.0×144.0×5.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 249 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nubia Fold
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nubia Fold
- 8.0" OLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nubia Fold
- 6560 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Nubia Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Nubia Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nubia Fold are nearly equal (61/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nubia Fold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra edges out the Nubia Fold by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nubia Fold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nubia Fold — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nubia Fold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Nubia Fold?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nubia Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users.