Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Nubia Fold
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nubia Fold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 73/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Fold has the bigger battery (6560 mAh vs 4700); the Nubia Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,113,462); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 249g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Nubia Fold
- Faster charging: 68W vs 55W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 249g
- Better camera (57/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3113462
- Bigger battery: 6560 vs 4700 mAh
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Nubia Fold, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 3 points higher (76/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nubia Fold are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Fold and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Nubia Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 8.0" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6560 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 55W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.0×144.0×5.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 249 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Fold
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nubia Fold
- 8.0" OLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nubia Fold
- 6560 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Nubia Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nubia Fold leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 0.2% in our overall performance rating.
Nubia Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nubia Fold are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nubia Fold and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nubia Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nubia Fold?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Nubia Fold by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nubia Fold?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Nubia Fold — 73/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Nubia Fold?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nubia Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users.