Motorola Razr 70+ vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Motorola Razr 70+ (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 67/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 70+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70+
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Motorola Razr 70+ better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 207g
- Better portability (75/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $1099
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 91/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70+ vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 17 points higher (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70+ — 44/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (73/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (75/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70+ | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70+
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1084x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70+
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70+ and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Motorola Razr 70+ by 42.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $449. Vivo iQOO 13 was $449 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (91/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (78/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (73/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (75/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 70+ — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Motorola Razr 70+ has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70+ over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Motorola Razr 70+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.