Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Poco C40
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 31/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.2mm).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Poco C40
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 199g vs 204g
- Better camera (57/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 44/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Overall rating 31/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Poco C40, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 45 points higher (76/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (94/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco C40 (68/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Poco C40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | JLQ | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 720x1650 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $1099 | — |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Poco C40
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (94/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (57/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco C40 (68/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco C40?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 45 points (76/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Poco C40?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Poco C40 — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Poco C40?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Poco C40?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use.