Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 66/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Performance 75
Display 91
Camera 58
Battery 36
Portability 75
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88

What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 226g

  • Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (75/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 1797821
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 58/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 23 points higher (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (97/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (75/100 vs 40/100).

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1797821 3600724
Geekbench Single 1923 3639
Geekbench Multi 5179 11047
Display 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2640 3200x1440
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 189 g 226 g
Launch price — $999

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
58
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
91
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
36
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
66/100
1797821 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +50.1%
3600724 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 50.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

$999

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (97/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (93/100 vs 58/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 36/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (75/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 58/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.